IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Period
The standard IAS 10 has been here for a long time. In fact, it is one of the oldest standards in place.
It is sweet and short and often it is seen as a minor thing compared to other complex standards.
However, the ongoing pandemic of coronavirus brought this standard to light.
Clearly, the biggest effects of pandemic on businesses happened in 2020, after the end of 2019 reporting year.
So, what does IAS 10 says about similar events? Should you adjust or not?
Let’s sum it up.
Why IAS 10?
The objective of the standard IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Period is to answer to two main questions:
- WHEN you should adjust your financial statements for the events after the reporting period; and
- WHAT you should disclose about those events.
Let’s answer those one by one.
When should you consider events after the reporting period?
By definition (IAS 10. 3), events after the reporting period are those events, both favorable and unfavorable, that occur between:
- The end of the reporting period, and
- The date when the financial statements are authorized for issue
So imagine that the end of your reporting period is 31 December 20X1, your accountants finish the closing works on 31 January 20X2, the board of directors authorizes them for issue on 15 February 20X2 and the shareholders approve them on 28 February 20X2.
By definition, you need to consider everything that happens between 31 December 20X1 and 15 February 20X2 as an event after the reporting period.
OK, but what if earthquake happens on 16 February 20X2 and destroys your building?
Well, that is the event after the reporting period for sure, but not under the definition of IAS 10, because it falls outside those two important dates.
Of course, the date of authorization of the financial statements for issue by the management might defer based on the specific country legislation.
The standard IAS 10 specifically says that if the financial statements need to be approved by the supervisory board made up solely of non-executives, still the management’s approval date is more important and decisive (i.e. you don’t care about the date of approval by the supervisory board).
Let’s move to the second question:
What should you report on events after the reporting period?
OK, so your event after the reporting period falls within the two important dates and thus you must do something about it .
It depends on the type of the event you’re dealing with.
There are two types:
1. Adjusting events
These are events that provide evidence of conditions that existed at the end of the reporting period.
- The court case is settled after the end of the reporting period and it confirms that an entity had a present obligation and should have created a provision in line with IAS 37.
- Bankruptcy of a customer after the end of the reporting period confirming that a client was credit-impaired and ECL should have been recognized in line with IFRS 9.
- Sale of inventories after the end of the reporting period at below-cost price suggesting that the inventories’ NRV was lower that their cost.
- Profit-sharing or bonus payments determined after the end of the reporting period suggesting that there was a present obligation at the year-end.
- Discovery of errors or fraud showing that the financial statements are incorrect.
What to do with those events?
In line with IAS 10.8, you should adjust the amounts recognized in your financial statements to reflect adjusting events after the reporting period.
DEF faces the court case for selling contaminated food to its customers. DEF denied all claims and no provision was made in its financial statements at 31 December 20X1.
On 2 February 20X2, the court awards CU 1 mil. damages against DEF. The financial statements have not yet been authorized for issue at that time.
Therefore, this adjusting event must be reflected in the financial statements at 31 December 20X1.
DEF needs to create a provision for the damages because the present obligation existed at 31 December 20X1 (they sold contaminated food prior that date):
- Debit Legal costs in profit or loss: CU 1 mil.;
- Credit Provision against legal costs: CU 1 mil.
2. Non-adjusting events
These are events that are indicative of conditions that arose after the reporting period.
- Decline in fair value of investments after the reporting period,
- Natural disasters, wars, pandemics, etc. happening after the reporting period
What to do with those events?
In line with IAS 10.10, you shall NOT adjust the amounts recognized in your financial statements to reflect non-adjusting events after the reporting period.
Instead, in line with IAS 10.21, you should disclose, for each material category of non-adjusting events after the reporting period, both:
- The nature of the event, and
- An estimate of its financial effect (or say it cannot be made if that’s true).
DEF owns a plant. On 15 January 20X2, huge earthquake in the area destroyed the plant.
The financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X1 have not been yet authorized for issue by the management at the time of earthquakes.
DEF should NOT adjust the numbers in the financial statements, because the earthquake is non-adjusting event.
Instead, DEF discloses this event and its financial effect in the notes to the financial statements.
Dividends after the reporting period
The standard IAS 10 specifically says in par. 12, that the dividends declared after the reporting period are NOT reported as a liability at the end of the reporting period.
In other words, you need to treat them like they are non-adjusting event
Let’s say that in January 20X2 DEF declared dividend in total amount of CU 10 000 from profit of 20X1.
The dividend liability is recognized when the shareholder’s right to receive them has been established – that is supposedly in January 20X2, but NOT in 20X1.
IAS 10 and going concern
IAS 10.14 says that you should NOT prepare your financial statements on a going concern basis if the management determines after the reporting period either that:
- it intends to liquidate the entity, or
- it intends to cease trading, or
- it has no realistic alternative but to do one of the above two.
What does it practically mean?
Well if any of events after the reporting period trigger liquidation of business or cessation of trading, then going concern no longer applies and the entity will not operate for at least 12 months after the reporting period.
Let me give you two illustrations:
#1 Management decides to liquidate
Let’s say that on 15 January 20X2, DEF’s managers decide to liquidate the business and sell all the assets and settle all the liabilities of DEF.
Here, going concern no longer applies and the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X1 shall not be prepared on a going concern basis.
How shall they be prepared then? I wrote a Q&A episode on this topic here.
#2 Earthquake devastates the business
Take a look at the earthquake illustration described above, but now imagine that earthquake was so bad that destroyed most of DEF’s assets and as a result, DEF will not be able to continue the business.
I have written above that the earthquake was a non-adjusting event and therefore DEF should just disclose it with its financial effects.
However, that was valid under the assumption that DEF would survive the earthquake and continue the business in the foreseeable future.
Now, DEF is in a completely different situation.
Here, going concern does NOT apply as DEF is forced to stop the business.
As a result, regardless of earthquake being non-adjusting event, the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X1 are NOT prepared under going concern assumption.
Finally…. how about coronavirus pandemic?
I have described my position on the current coronavirus pandemic, including the application of IAS 10, here in this article.
In summary, I believe that the current pandemic is a non-adjusting event, because the most businesses are affected by the measures taken by the governments to stop the spread, and not by the virus itself.
The measures taken by the governments happened mostly after the end of 2019.
However, let me make this point clear:
If the impact of the measures on your business resulting is so severe that your business will not survive, then the going concern no longer applies and you should NOT prepare the financial statements under the going concern assumption.
Here’s the video with the summary of IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Period:
Please, share your thoughts and experiences below this article. Thank you!
JOIN OUR FREE NEWSLETTER AND GET
report "Top 7 IFRS Mistakes" + free IFRS mini-course
Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.
- How to calculate bad debt provision under IFRS 9 on
- Example: Construction contracts under IFRS 15 on
- How to Make Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows with Foreign Currencies on
- 015: How to prepare financial statements when going concern does not apply? on
- How to calculate bad debt provision under IFRS 9 on
- About IFRS (15)
- Accounting estimates (IAS 8) (5)
- Accounting policies (4)
- Consolidation and Groups (20)
- Employees (8)
- FAQ (1)
- Financial Instruments (47)
- Financial Statements (25)
- Foreign currency (9)
- How To (18)
- IFRS Accounting (64)
- IFRS Summaries (28)
- IFRS videos (40)
- Impairment of assets (6)
- Income Tax (9)
- Intangible assets (8)
- Inventories (14)
- Leases (17)
- Most popular (6)
- Not just IFRS (9)
- Podcast (40)
- PPE (IAS 16 and related) (38)
- Provisions and Contingencies (5)
- Revenue recognition (19)
- Sectors&Industries (4)
- Uncategorized (2)
- US GAAP (2)