004: Can we classify loans with variable interest at amortized cost?
IFRS Question 004: Variable-interest loan with collateral – at amortized cost?
We provided a loan with a variable interest rate and there is a limitation for max/min interest rates to be paid.
Will this feature prevent this loan from passing SPPI test (solely payment of principal and interest)?
Or it is still possible to classify this loan as amortized cost category?
Are there any limitations of SPPI test passing on the basis of collateral type?
Implementation guidance in IFRS 9 specifies that “In some cases a financial asset may have contractual cash flows that are described as principal and interest but those cash flows do not represent the payment of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding . For example, this could be the case when a creditor’s claim is limited to specified assets of the debtor or the cash flows from specified assets.
Could you please tell us some examples in order to clearly understand what does the Standard mean in this case? Because it is a usual practice that loans are collateralized by particular assets, for example mortgage or other collateral type.
IFRS answer 004
Under IFRS 9, you can classify the loan at amortized cost only if it passes 2 tests:
- Business model test: The objective of the entity’s business model is to hold the financial asset to collect the contractual cash flows (rather than to sell the instrument prior to its contractual maturity to realize its fair value changes).If you are a bank that normally creates loans and you normally collect the repayments of these loans – and you are not selling or otherwise trading with these loans, well, then this criterion is met. But in this answer, we will not deal with it.We will more focus on the second criterion that is
- Cash flow characteristics test: The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding. Nothing else.That’s the abbreviation SPPI – solely the payments of principal and interest.
If the loan meets both criteria, then you can classify it at amortized cost and set up a nice effective interest method table and recognize interest and repayment of principal over the life of the loan in line with that table.
But what if the loan fails to meet one of these criteria? In such a case, no amortized cost, but you have to classify the loan at fair value through profit or loss.
That is additional burden and completely different accounting, because you have to set the fair value of such a loan at each reporting date – which is not automatic and can be difficult and challenging.
Let’s get back to the question.
Does the variable interest loan pass contractual cash flows test?
The answer is – it depends.
The interest must reflect only the consideration for the time value of money and credit risk – nothing else.
If there’s something else included, then it would not be OK and the test would fail.
Examples: The loan meets the test
- Interest rate linked to market ratesIf the variable interest loan provided by the European bank is let’s say LIBOR 6m+0.5% – in other words, tied to some interbank market rate and nothing else – yes, that’s fine, because the cash flows from that loan are solely the payments of principal and interest – it does not matter whether it’s variable or fixed interest.
- Maximum or minimum interest to be paidIf there’s some limit on the amount of interest to be paid – some cap with maximum interest or floor with minimum interest – it reduces the variability of cash flows from the interest paid.If this is the only reason for cap or floor, then it’s OK and the test is passed.
- Interest linked to inflationThen we can have a loan that carries interest linked to inflation. What to do in this case?If the terms say that the loan carries an interest depending on the inflation index each year, then it’s fine because linking payments of interest and principal to inflation index kind of updates the time value of money to the current level. The test is passed.
- Full recourse loans with collateralsIf the loan is full recourse, or fully backed by the collateral of the borrower, then yes, we can say that this collateral does not affect the loans classification and the loan can still meet contractual cash flows test.
All these types of the loans meet the contractual cash flows characteristics test and if the business model test is met, too, you can classify them at amortized cost.
Examples: The loan does NOT meet the test
- Non-recourse loan with collateralWhen you have a non-recourse loan secured by some collateral, it might not pass the test. Why?Non-recourse loan means that if the debtor defaults, the bank can take the collateral (like sell the property and take the cash to collect the loan), but the bank but has no right any further compensation, even if the collateral does not cover the full value of the defaulted amount.
So in this case, logically, contractual cash flows can be limited to the value of collateral and that is not meeting the contractual cash flows test.
Just don’t panic if you are a retail bank providing mortgages to individual clients, these are full recourse in most countries and in most cases.
- Interest depends on cash flows from collateralsAnother example of not meeting the test is loans with interest depending on some cash flows from collateralized assets.Let’s say the bank provides a loan for the construction of apartment house, the collateral is the land under the house and the payments of cash flows can be increased or decreased depending on the sales proceeds got from the sales of apartments.
This does not meet the test, because the cash flows include also other component – share on profit – not only payment of interest/principal.
Another example – if the future repayment of loan depends on the movement in market price of collateral – that’s the problem, too.
- Loans convertible to fixed amount of ordinary sharesAnother example of loan not passing the test is convertible loan to fixed amount of ordinary shares.If the bank provides a loan to some big company with option to convert this loan into ordinary shares instead of taking repayment, that’s the problem, because the cash flows are NOT only for repayment of principal and interest, but they are adjusted for the conversion feature.
Again, this requires careful analysis, because if the loan is convertible to variable number of shares and the unpaid amount of loan equals to the fair value of total shares converted, then that’s OK. It’s not all black or white.
- Loans with leveraged interest ratesWhat about leveraged interest rates? Or link to leveraged inflation index?
For example, what if the loan carries an interest of 2 times 3-month LIBOR – that’s leveraged, because it’s multiple.That’s the problem, too, because the variability of cash flows steeply increases and these cash flows do not have the economic characteristics of interest – reflecting just the time value of money or credit risk.
In general, this is for a long debate, I just gave you a few examples of the most common cases, but remember – you always need to assess whether the cash flows are only a principal repaid and interest, and whether that interest reflects just the time value of money and credit risk.
JOIN OUR FREE NEWSLETTER AND GET
report "Top 7 IFRS Mistakes" + free IFRS mini-course
Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.
- About IFRS (15)
- Accounting estimates (IAS 8) (5)
- Accounting policies (4)
- Consolidation and Groups (20)
- Employees (8)
- FAQ (1)
- Financial Instruments (47)
- Financial Statements (25)
- Foreign currency (9)
- How To (18)
- IFRS Accounting (64)
- IFRS Summaries (28)
- IFRS videos (40)
- Impairment of assets (6)
- Income Tax (9)
- Intangible assets (8)
- Inventories (14)
- Leases (17)
- Most popular (6)
- Not just IFRS (9)
- Podcast (40)
- PPE (IAS 16 and related) (38)
- Provisions and Contingencies (5)
- Revenue recognition (19)
- Sectors&Industries (4)
- Uncategorized (2)
- US GAAP (2)